Shocker Stat: 336 Kids Killed for Every 1 Child Saved by the Vaccine

By US Politics and News Last updated May 24, 2022

Inventor and entrepreneur Steve Kirsch has released the preliminary results from ten surveys that he conducted on COVID shot effectiveness over the past couple of weeks. The results are shocking and anyone who sees them will never want to allow the experimental mRNA shots from Pfizer or Moderna to be injected into their body, or into their children’s bodies.

Whether you want to call them polls or surveys or a statistical analysis, these are real results reported by Americans who have been personally harmed by the vaccines, or who have lost loved ones to the vaccines. The CDC could replicate all these studies right now very easily and debunk Steve’s numbers if he got it wrong. Why do you suppose they are unwilling to do that?

Full disclosure: I personally participated in three of Steve’s surveys over the weekend. As an outsider looking in, my impression is that his methodology was sound. If anyone has a problem with Steve’s survey results, they should explain what they think he got wrong. Don’t wave your hands in the air and get all butthurt; prove him wrong using the data. In fact, that’s exactly what Steve is inviting his critics to do, using a process called ACTUAL SCIENCE. But his opponents are not doing that. Instead, they’re wailing and gnashing their teeth and walking around in sackcloth.

Here are some of the results of Steve’s surveys. And again, these numbers are coming from actual Americans reporting what has happened to them, to their friends and neighbors and loved ones and even acquaintances.

Here’s the most shocking number:

For every 1 child between ages 5 and 11 whose life may have been saved by a COVID shot, 336 have been killed by the shots. Let that sink in. 336 kids die from the vaccine for every 1 life saved.

COVID has never been all that dangerous to children. Two years into the “pandemic,” less than a thousand kids have ever died from it. A lot of kids don’t even present symptoms when they catch. Only very sick and vulnerable kids are threatened by this relatively mild virus at all. There is no good reason to use these experimental medicines on 5- to 11-year-olds in the first place. Yet these young children are dying from liver disease, strokes, heart attacks, myocarditis and other vaccine-induced causes.

Another major finding of Steve Kirsch’s surveys is that the COVID shots have killed roughly the same number of Americans as COVID itself. The first shot in the series increases all-cause mortality (ACM) by a factor of 6X over the five-year average. That’s a 600% increased chance of dying from the very first mRNA vaccine, compared to an unvaccinated person.

The second shot in the series appears to be the most dangerous. ACM increases to 8X during the 30-day period after the second shot. ACM drops down to 4.8X after the first booster shot.

Another finding: 80% of all miscarriages in the United States happened to vaccinated mothers. Steve notes that VAERS data reported to the CDC shows that heavy menstrual bleeding is the number one side effect of the shots. Vaccinated women experience heavy bleeding that is 8,800 times above normal. A statistical analysis of the VAERS data on deaths, by the way, indicates that 492,000 Americans have now suffered early deaths as a result of the shots. And that 492,000 is the rock-bottom, most conservative estimate.

Yet another finding: The CDC heavily recommended that cancer patients receive the vaccine because of their weakened immune systems. Many patients followed that advice.

Yet 55% of respondents indicated that their cancer got worse AFTER they got the shots. The cancer was unchanged in about 20% of respondents. No one’s cancer condition improved after being vaccinated. 0% of Steve Kirsch’s respondents with cancer reported improvement. Not a single one!

These are preliminary survey results, of course, so the numbers could change a little bit before the analysis is completely done. However, the results will not shift by very much – that’s not how statistical analysis works. Once Steve publishes the full results and findings of these surveys, we’ll likely hear a lot of squawking from his critics. So, it’s worth repeating this: Anyone and especially the CDC could replicate these studies to debunk Steve’s numbers. Why won’t they do that?